I have run the video you are about to watch (and I am sorry the shooter's name is in it) thru someone who was/ able to, in turn, run it by a lot of folks. All of them experienced law enforcement officers and/or agents. Here is a summary of opinions on the video.
I haven’t talked to a single person here that thinks this kid acted alone, not ONE. I showed the video you sent me to several who have the skill and knowledge of long guns, and the particulars this audio, pointed out, proving that there was at least one additional shooter, every one of them found the video credible, and accurate.
I sent the video to "Bill" (a former agent using ficticious name), he watched it twice, and then called me back. As "Bill" and I talked, two things jumped out immediately; (1) the height/angle of the bullet striking the very top row of the grandstands behind President Trump; trajectory ballistic physics would not allow a bullet, shot from where Crooks was on that roof, to hit that rail, at that height, (unless it was a ricochet, but a ricochet would not have that much force/energy behind it).
(2) The narrator of the video specifically mentioned that the round that hit the top rail could not be a 5.56 round(the caliber that Crooks was shooting), it had the characteristics of a .308 round(7.62x52mm), the .308 is standard issue for most police and Federal counter-sniper teams……something to think about. Something else we both took note of; on Friday, The Secret Service denied a Freedom Of Information Act request on the Trump shooting due to “a lack of urgency”….classic attempt of CYA (cover your a##).
"Bill" felt that the video was credible enough to pass it on to a former colleague, who was a spotter for a scout sniper team. He watched the video, and he found it “absolutely credible”, particularly in the detail of the audio signatures of the different shots with their “reports”, combined with video signatures of the shots and their “reports” on the narrator’s computer screen. The video further solidified what "Bill" felt concerning a “fixer”, or second shooter being on site, the former spotter already thought this before he talked with "Bill", or saw the video; he feels even stronger about it now. Both think it was virtually impossible this kid could have set this up, carried it out, acting alone. How does a 20 year old kid have three encrypted overseas bank accounts ? Who would be sending him money overseas ? Who bought him a drone ? Who bought him a rangefinder scope ? Who bought him a van and the explosives that were inside that van ? One name that came up during Bill and the spotter’s conversation was “Soros”……
Watch the video, assign whatever credibility you like, and decide for yourself. As of now, I am of the opinion that this act was committed in a coordinated effort by multiple persons. I think a former CIA Director is responsible for the orchestration of this attempt on former President Donald Trump's life. I believe this is just the beginning of the unraveling of this yarn of a mystery.